File consists of documents regarding environmental activism court cases. The file includes a handwritten letter asking for support from Betty Krawczyk, court documents and newspaper clippings regarding the MacMillan Bloedel v. Simpson et al. case, a photocopy of a journal article titled “When the Public Interest Loses: The Liability of Public Interest Litigants for Adverse Costs Awards” by Chris Tollefson, and print-outs from three pages of the “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” Government of British Columbia website.
File consists of records related to Betty Krawczyk’s incarceration at Burnaby Correctional Centre for Women. File includes correspondence from the Director of Operations in regards to returned mail, receipts, a B.C.C.W. Request form, and a trust account slip.
File consists of four textual records regarding court orders, a table of authorities, submissions in support of order sought concerning costs, and a brief transcript in regards to the R. v. Mrs. Krawczyk Supreme Court of British Columbia case.
File consists of two printed online articles. One article is titled “Supreme Court of Canada – Decisions – R. v. Nasogaluak” and the other is a Wikipedia article titled “Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General).
File consists of six printed-out online articles and one excerpt from Martin’s Criminal Code. The online articles are from: "CanLII," "The Court blog," "Criminal Contempt of Court," and "Social Science Research Network."
File consists of court records regarding the Supreme Court of British Columbia’s case between Regina and Betty Krawczyk. File includes four reports titled “Reasons for Judgment,” “Oral Reasons for Sentence,” “Oral Reasons for Judgment,” and “Betty Krawczyk’s Rap Sheet.” File also includes a photocopy of Krawczyk’s’ Promise to Appear form, and transcripts titled: “Closing for Crown Argument by Mr. Brundett” and “Submissions by Mr. Burndrett re: Charter.”
File consists of one bound volume containing numerous court documents related to an earlier court case involving the Elaho region and John Prescott. The file contains affidavit and court exhibit items related to the case.
File consists of court documents related to the R. v. Krawczyk Supreme Court of British Columbia case. File contains correspondence from the Government addressed to Krawczyk, an “Appellent’s Factum,” a one-page print-out from CanLII, a photocopy of the article “Re Skapinker and the Mootness Doctrine” written by Patrick Macklem and Eric Gertner, Krawczyk’s typed speech on mootness, an abstract for an article titled “The Partially Prudential Doctrine of Mootness” written by Matthew I. Hall, and two online print-outs on mootness in appeals.
File consists of correspondence and legal statements in regards to Betty Krawczyk’s Supreme Court of British Columbia case with Peter Kiewitt Sons Co et al. File contains correspondence from A. Cameron Ward & Company, a legal document titled “Accused’s Submissions – Relevance of Evidence, Including Testimony of the Attorney General, Relating to Abuse of Process,” printed e-mails, photocopy of a newspaper clipping, Krawczyk’s outgoing correspondence to Madam Justice Brown, a police statement, and Krawczyk’s speech notes.
File consists of legal documents regarding the Supreme Court of British Columbia’s case between Betty Krawczyk and Peter Kiewit Sons Co. et al. The file contains two “Writ of Summons,” a “Statement of Claim,” a “Demand for Discovery of Documents,” a “Notice of Application for Constitutional Remedy,” a “Notice Requiring Trial by Jury,” Krawczyk’s responses, and a print-out of an online article on court cases.
File consists of documents related to the Supreme Court of British Columbia’s case between Regina and Betty Krawczyk. File contains “Oral Reasons for Judgment,” “Oral Reasons for Sentence,” CanLII print-outs, and a transcript titled “Closing for Crown Argument by Mr. Brundrett.”
File consists of numerous documents related to the Supreme Court of British Columbia case between Regina and Betty Krawczyk. File contains Krawczyk’s incoming correspondence regarding the trial, a “Notice of Appeal against Conviction,” three “Notices of Motion,” handwritten notes, court file notes, a “Oral Reasons for Judgment,” and two trial transcripts.
File consists of numerous print-outs from Section 1 of the CanLII website and a “Notice of Constitutional Question” in regards to Betty Krawczyk’s court case against the State.
File consists of two print-outs of online resources. File contains a copy of “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” and “Arishekoff v. British Columbia” from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia.
File consists of court documents, correspondence, and research related to Betty Krawczyk’s court case against Peter Kiewit Sons Co. et al. File’s court documents include two “Notices of Appeal or Application for Leave to Appeal;” one “Response”; one “Statement of Defence of Kevin Falcon, Minister of Transportation”; one “Outline”; one “Provincial Defendant’s Outline Rule 18A”; and one “Accused’s Submissions – Relevance of Evidence, Including Testimony of the Attorney General, Relating to Abuse of Process.” File also includes Krawczyk’s incoming correspondence related to her case, a Wikipedia article titled “Proximate Cause,” an abstract for an article on tort law, and an encyclopedia entry on remoteness.
File consists of Betty Krawczyk’s statements and applications while in court. File contains signed applications, typed statements, and excerpts from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Martin’s Criminal Code.
File consists of Betty Krawczyk’s handwritten statements for her appearances in court and her outgoing letters of correspondence to the media, including Radical Press, documenting her experiences in the Burnaby Correctional Centre for Women.
File consists of court documents related to Betty Krawczyk’s trial. File contains court proceedings, an article on the structure of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, a Wikipedia article on Mandamus, and print-outs from CanLII and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.
File consists of two court documents related to Betty Krawczyk’s Supreme Court of British Columbia case against International Forest Products Limited, Elaho Logging Ltd. and B.R. Adam Ltd. File contains associated reports on eleven other court cases, and a bound volume titled “Chambers Brief” on Krawczyk’s trial.
File consists of court documents regarding Betty Krawczyk’s trial against Her Majesty the Queen. File contains a “Notice of Application for Constitutional Remedy,” handwritten speech notes, “Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Pitfield,” and a report from Quicklaw titled “International Forest Products Ltd. v. Kern.”
File consists of court documents regarding three Supreme Court of British Columbia court cases – Her Majesty the Queen against Samuel Kelly, Jody Sim, Andrea Schaal, and Kevin Kunzler; MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Simpson; and Regina v. Betty Krawczyk. The file contains a report titled “Oral Reasons for Sentencing,” two Quicklaw reports, e-mail print-outs, and a report titled “Reasons for Judgment” for Krawczyk’s case. The file also includes a print-out of a Wikipedia article on polygamy.
File consists of court documents, excerpts from articles, and handwritten notes regarding the Supreme Court of British Columbia court cases associated with Betty Krawczyk. File contains a report titled “International Forest Products Ltd. v. Kern,” “Submissions of Betty Krawczyk,” Krawczyk’s handwritten research, typed speech notes, “Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Pitfield,” a photocopy of an article titled “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation: Developing a Canadian Response” by Chris Tollefson, an excerpt from “Mandamus and Environmental Protest,” incoming correspondence, a report CanLII report titled “Greenpeace Canada v. MacMillan Bloedel Ltd.,” and photocopies of magazine articles related to Krawczyk’s case.
File consists of court documents regarding Betty Krawczyk’s Supreme Court of British Columbia’s case against Hayes Forest Services Limited. File contains Krawczyk’s typed speech, a report titled “Hayes Forest Services Limited v. Krawczyk” from CanLII, a report titled “Reasons for Judgment,” and a “Writ of Summons.”
